Thank you.
Dmitry
2009/2/5 Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> Дмитрий Дьяченко wrote:
>
>> 2009/2/5 Andrew Pinski <pinskia@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Дмитрий Дьяченко <dimhen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> The following code
>>>>
>>>> int bar(int *global)
>>>> {
>>>> int local;
>>>> if(&local != global)
>>>> return 0;
>>>> return local;
>>>> }
>>> The issue is that GCC does not figure that global cannot point to
>>> local so it does not optimize away the if statement.
>
>> Sorry, but I don't understood - is it impossible to fix, so there are
>> no needs in bug report?
>> Or PR about this issue already exists?
>> Or it's not a bug?
>
> It's not a bug. gcc is warning you that the return statement may use an
> uninitialized local. It does, so there is not a bug. The fact that the
> return statement isn't reachable doesn't imply that there should be no
> warning.
>
> Andrew.
>
