In addition if I am specifying a thumb2 platform, thumb2 is defined: [rje@rje-pc xxxxx]$ arm-eabi-gcc -mthumb -mcpu=cortex-m3 -dM -E - < /dev/null .... #define __thumb2__ 1 .... I'm just not sure how to get a multilib with thumb2 installed and used by gcc. Thanks, Rob On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Rob Emanuele <poorarm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Jeff, > > In my case: > > [rje@rje-pc xxxxx]$ arm-eabi-gcc --print-multi-lib > .; > thumb;@mthumb > > This proves I am missing that multilib. How would I go about creating it? > > Thank you, > > Rob > > > On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Regarding building newlib, you should know about multilibs. Multilibs are >> versions of the library >> built with specific options. The compiler determines what multilibs should >> exist and how to build them. >> The compiler has an option: --print-multi-lib which specifies the various >> permutations >> of options to build the library with and what subdirectories to put them >> under. Newlib issues this >> option to determine how many multilibs to build and how to do it. >> >> For example, the mn10300-elf-gcc compiler I have on my system gives: >> >> [jjohnstn@vermillion]$ ./mn10300-elf-gcc --print-multi-lib >> .; >> am33;@mam33 >> am33-2;@mam33-2 >> am34;@mam34 >> >> Note that this indicates there are 3 additional multilibs in addition to the >> default library (.;). The >> am33 version of the library uses a subdirectory named "am33" and is compiled >> with the -mam33 option, the am33-2 is built with -mam33-2, etc... Sometimes >> you have permutations and can end up with nested subdirectories (e.g. a >> bigendian and soft-float library could be stored under a subdirectory >> be/sf). >> >> When you compile/link an application via gcc and specify a particular >> multilib option, the compiler will try and >> find the library under the specified subdirectory or subdirectories of the >> location where newlib has been specified to be. This does not occur if you >> do the link yourself via ld (you have to figure out where the library has >> been stored). >> >> So, check to see if the compiler you are ultimately using in the newlib >> build has a thumb2 multilib and the option(s) used (via --print-multi-lib). >> Then, verify that the compiler is setting the __thumb2__ flag when this >> particular option is chosen which is what ultimately determines if the >> thumb2-specific code in setjmp.S is being activated properly. >> >> -- Jeff J. >> >> Rob Emanuele wrote: >>> >>> Alexandre, >>> >>> Yes, it builds but I don't see any code generated for thumb2. I see >>> ARM and thumb but not thumb2. >>> >>> --Rob >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Alexandre Pereira Nunes >>> <alexandre.nunes@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Rob Emanuele <poorarm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Greetings, >>>>> >>>>> I'm trying to build newlib and gcc for a Cortex-M3 processor. What >>>>> are the best ways for doing this? I'm running into a problem with the >>>>> "setjmp" call as it is not being compiled correctly for Thumb2. It is >>>>> only being compiled for Thumb. Are there a set of instructions on the >>>>> proper build procedure to get all the libs built for arm, thumb, and >>>>> thumb2? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> Rob Emanuele >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Are you trying 1.17.0 ? It should build fine. >>>> >>>> >> >> >