Re: Standard conformance, the -std option and "GCC Bugzilla Bug 10152".

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rodolfo Federico Gamarra wrote:

> Given that DR45 is not included in a Technical Corrigenda, isn't it
> premature for GNU/g++ to implement its solution (at least when given
> the option -std=c++98)?

The problem is that there isn't enough normative language in the standard
to determine exactly what to do.  We have to resolve the issue one way
or another, and the DR is the best guess we have as to what language
the standard will eventually use.

Andrew.

[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux