Re: gcc optimization return value handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "rekisum@xxxxxx" <rekisum@xxxxxx>, GCC-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: gcc optimization return value handling
From: "John (Eljay) Love-Jensen" <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 05:17:27 -0800
In-reply-to: <1206777042@xxxxxx>

Hi,

Is a setjmp/longjmp involved?

If so, the volatile is required (as per the description in "man setjmp").

HTH,
--Eljay

References:
- gcc optimization return value handling
  - From: rekisum

Prev by Date: Re: gcc optimization return value handling
Next by Date: Re: gcc optimization return value handling
Previous by thread: Re: gcc optimization return value handling
Next by thread: Re: gcc optimization return value handling
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux