On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > "Tom Browder" <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx> writes: ... >> I have attached a much-shortened list of the kinds of warnings I'm >> talking about--all from stage 2 or later. Shouldn't these be taken >> care of by the developers (i.e., suppressed somehow)? > > Yes, ideally they should. Patches are welcome. We are all gcc > developers. Good point--sounds like something for the project list (and it's already there: beginners, warning patrol--duh!) Happy New Year to all! -Tom
