Re: gcc vs g++ for dlopen

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: gcc vs g++ for dlopen
From: Kolesar <asim.husanovic@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 00:44:17 -0800 (PST)
In-reply-to: <C5531783.3649C%eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <20699786.post@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C552D42F.3647E%eljay@xxxxxxxxx> <20707261.post@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C5531783.3649C%eljay@xxxxxxxxx>

Hi Eljay

libasim.so is compiled with jam :S. It is a extern library for me :(

BR
Kolesar

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/gcc-vs-g%2B%2B-for-dlopen-tp20699786p20715368.html
Sent from the gcc - Help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gcc vs g++ for dlopen
  - From: Andrew Haley

References:
- gcc vs g++ for dlopen
  - From: Kolesar
- Re: gcc vs g++ for dlopen
  - From: John (Eljay) Love-Jensen
- Re: gcc vs g++ for dlopen
  - From: Kolesar
- Re: gcc vs g++ for dlopen
  - From: John (Eljay) Love-Jensen

Prev by Date: *** buffer overflow detected *** error
Next by Date: Re: gcc vs g++ for dlopen
Previous by thread: Re: gcc vs g++ for dlopen
Next by thread: Re: gcc vs g++ for dlopen
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux