hi, http://marc.info/?l=gcc&m=117509069809692&w=2, Is this option removed ? Does there exist a similar option ? On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 6:39 AM, Matthew Woehlke <mw_triad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Niklaus wrote: >> >> 1) How to tell gcc to stop after the first error. I use both gcc >> 4.2 and gcc 3.4. I tried -Wfatal-error and -Wfatal-error it says >> unrecognized option. > > You could do something like: > > gcc <blah> | tee <output-file> | grep -El <regexpr that finds errors> > > ...which would return relatively quickly if an error is found, otherwise > will run to completion. (Note: especially using tee, I'm not sure what will > happen when grep exits, i.e. if tee and/or grep will die or not, so I would > suggest testing, and invoking 'kill' if needed.) > >> 3) Can this submissions be collected for every 5 secs and then >> compiled in parallel to produce parallel output. Invoking gcc for each >> submission is going to be slow ? > > Why not just make a system that fires off a submission in a separate process > whenever one arrives? Assuming you have a way to collect a batch, I don't > know why you couldn't submit them in parallel, but why wait? > > -- > Matthew > Please do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies. > -- > Sendmail administration is not black magic. There are legitimate technical > reasons why it requires the sacrifice of a live chicken. > -- Unknown > >
