On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 10:45 -0500, Paul Jarc wrote: > (I'm not subscribed here; Mail-Followup-To set.) <snip> > as it was spelled in > "./configure --prefix=...". That spelling is an absolute path with no > double slashes or .. elements, but it does have symlinks. <snip> > Is there any reason this change shouldn't be applied upsteam? Maybe unrelated to your patch, but I'm wondering why you didn't encounter something like http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29831 (with gcc-4.1.1, although still unconfirmed). Because of this, I'm always trying hard to avoid configuring with --prefix containing symlinks. But haven't tried gcc-4.3 yet. /haubi/
