"Sivaprasad.pv" <sivaprasad.pv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> We want to upgrade our cross compiler (for custom processor) from
> gcc.3.3 to gcc.4.3.1.
> In this process we have successfully build the compiler, But it is
> fail to recognize the following (function with return value) insn
>
> test.c:17: error: unrecognizable insn:
> (call_insn 14 13 15 3 test.c:15 (set (reg:HI 0 d2)
> (call (mem:SI (symbol_ref:SI ("add") [flags 0x3] <function_decl
> 0xb7d08930 add>) [0 S4 A16])
> (const_int 8 [0x8]))) -1 (expr_list:REG_EH_REGION
> (const_int 0 [0x0])
> (nil))
> (nil))
> test.c:17: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:1990
>
> This is our define_expand for our call_value pattern:
>
> (define_expand "call_value"
> [(set (match_operand 0 "register_operand" "")
> (call (match_operand:SI 1 "" "")
> (match_operand:SI 2 "" "")))]
> ""
> "
> {
> if (GET_CODE (operands[1]) == MEM
> && ! address_operand (XEXP (operands[1], 0), SImode))
> {
> operands[1] = gen_rtx_MEM (GET_MODE (operands[1]),
> force_reg (Pmode, XEXP (operands[1], 0)));
> }
> }")
>
> define_insn for our call_value pattern:
>
> (define_insn "*call_value"
> [(set (match_operand 0 "register_operand" "=x,x")
> (call (mem:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "address_operand" "a,R"))
> (match_operand 2 "" ""))) ]
> ""
> "@
> jsri %1
> jsr %1"
> [(set_attr "type" "call")])
>
> where x- is return registers
> a= address register which can hold address of the function
> R= symbolic operand
>
> The same pattern definitions are working fine with gcc-3.3, But
> failing with gcc-4.3.1.
> I am unable to identify actual reason,so can you please help me in
> this regard.
Hard to say for sure what the problem is, but it seems like the most
likely cause would be your GO_IF_LEGITIMATE_ADDRESS macro rejecting
(symbol_ref:SI "add").
If that doesn't help, you're going to have to debug it.
Ian
