Rohit Garg wrote: > My question is that the functions which are called from file1.o are > inlined for speed. And they reside in file2.o. Now, the gcc docs say > inline functions are as fast as a macro. My question is, does the > inliine expansion work even when code is distributed across different > object files? No, the definition of the inline function must be in the same compilation unit as its call sites in order for it to be inlined, which means you need to put it in a header or otherwise arrange for it to be seen in every CU. > Further, this small ambiguity should be preferably cleared up in the > web based docs itself. If maintainers allow, I would like to > contribute this. I don't see what the ambiguity is. Macros have the same property, that they are required to be defined in a header that's included in every source file that uses them. What you're doing currently would fail to compile if using macros, so it's not really meaningful to try to compare the two. Brian
