Re: UTF-8, UTF-16 and UTF-32

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dear Matthew



This was never a debate between the merits of UTF-8 verses UTF-16 verses UTF-32, nor was it a debate about the merits of Linux/Solaris verses Windows, it was a discussion about the lack of standardized support for UTF-16 in gcc and with the move by Microsoft to deprecate UTF-8 in favour for UTF-16, it would make life increasingly difficult for all gcc developers to process UTF-16.



I can competently code in both a Linux/Solaris and Windows environment, I choose primarily Windows because I like writing software that interacts with people. Such social skills are surely lacking in other environments. And as much as you would like to believe that people like me are Windoze developers, it took me nearly 10 years to master the WinAPI plus MFC plus .NET architectures, but only about 2 months to master the Linux/Solaris APIs.



I like technology, I like change, if Microsoft deprecates the .NET architecture (which I think they have already done with .Net v3.5 XML / XSLT architecture), I will just spend the time upgrading to the new design - who wants to be a stick in the mud?



Yours sincerely,

Dallas.

http://www.ekkySoftware.com


[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux