Seyran Avanesyan wrote: > Yes, the target was Windows, and the separate fork is in active > development, this is why I was looking for earlier versions. > According to some posts gcc3.2.0 should do that. But it isn't, so I was > wondering if instead of downloading binaries I might have to compile > GCC/MinGW myself to get that working. x86_64 support for *Linux* was in gcc 3.2. Not Windows x64. They are very different targets even though the underlying hardware might be the same. > And I'm also interested in compiling 64-bit targets using original GCC > (planning to move Linux soon). What do you mean by "original gcc"? Brian
