Re: alignment bug?
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
To
: Gagan Arneja <
gaagaan@xxxxxxxxx
>
Subject
: Re: alignment bug?
From
: John Fine <
johnsfine@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
Date
: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 09:09:59 -0400
Cc
:
gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to
: <
480AE3AD.5090404@xxxxxxxxx
>
References
: <
480AE3AD.5090404@xxxxxxxxx
>
User-agent
: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4
I don't actually know, but maybe the optimizer figures out that c is
never used and eliminates it.
Gagan Arneja wrote:
What am I doing wrong? Why is "bar" getting truncated down to 128?
Follow-Ups
:
Re: alignment bug?
From:
Gagan Arneja
References
:
alignment bug?
From:
Gagan Arneja
Prev by Date:
Constructing the Control Dependence Graph form Dominance Frontier in SSA ?
Next by Date:
Re: Forcing register assignments before non-conditional blocks
Previous by thread:
Re: alignment bug?
Next by thread:
Re: alignment bug?
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[Linux C Programming]
[Linux Kernel]
[eCos]
[Fedora Development]
[Fedora Announce]
[Autoconf]
[The DWARVES Debugging Tools]
[Yosemite Campsites]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux GCC]
