Re: Signedness of char and puts()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Matthew Woehlke <mw_triad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, GCC-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Signedness of char and puts()
From: Eljay Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 06:39:39 -0500
In-reply-to: <fsk5df$7oc$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.1.0.080305

Hi Matthew,

> Isn't "Hello" technically const in C also, since -fwrite-strings was
> (thankfully, rightly) killed?

Maybe.  Hopefully.  I have not kept up with the latest developments in C.
(I switched to C++ in 1990, so I didn't get to enjoy the ISO/IEC 9899:1990
era of C standardization.)

Sincerely,
--Eljay

References:
- Re: Signedness of char and puts()
  - From: Matthew Woehlke

Prev by Date: Can I force gcc not to optimize calling to leaf functions with `-O2' option?
Next by Date: Re: Can I force gcc not to optimize calling to leaf functions with `-O2' option?
Previous by thread: Re: Signedness of char and puts()
Next by thread: Re: Signedness of char and puts()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux