Bill McEnaney wrote:
Why not write "inst" instead "insn?"
Because inst could be short for instance. Insn is fairly obvious if you read GCC code.
top post. Also don't Tom
Bill McEnaney wrote:
Why not write "inst" instead "insn?"
Because inst could be short for instance. Insn is fairly obvious if you read GCC code.
top post. Also don't Tom
|