Re: binary compiled with -O1 and w/ individual optimization flags are not the same

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



CSights wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to debug some mismatching results from a program compiled with O1,2,3) and without (-O0 or nothing) optimization flags. My thought was to individually turn on optimization flags and see which one changes the program's output. Unfortunately for this plan, the binaries produced using -O1 and those flags said to be turned on by g++ in the manual (-fdefer-pop -fdelayed-branch -fguess-branch-probability -fcprop-registers -fif-conversion -fif-conversion2 -ftree-ccp -ftree-dce -ftree-dominator-opts -ftree-dse -ftree-ter -ftree-lrs -ftree-sra -ftree-copyrename -ftree-fre -ftree-ch -funit-at-a-time -fmerge-constants) do not match.

No, they wouldn't: without -O you get no optimizations.  Doesn't matter
what individual opt flags you put on the command line.

I also tried without -fdelayed-branch b/c it is not supported on my architectures (i386: athlon xp, core duo) and with -fomit-frame-pointer in case that was the difference.
	I've tried this with g++ versions
g++ (GCC) 4.2.3 (Debian 4.2.3-1) and
i686-apple-darwin8-g++-4.0.1 (GCC) 4.0.1 (Apple Computer, Inc. build 5363)
Is there a way to have g++ tell me which flags it is actually using when compiling a program. E.g. expand -O1 to the individual optimization flags at run time?

-save-temps -fverbose-asm puts all the optimizations into the .s file.

	Anyone have any other suggestions?

Being a bit more scientific, what is the difference between runs?

Andrew.

[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux