Re: Re: gcc 3.2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Eljay Love-Jensen wrote:

I'm not sure (since I don't use them), but other options on Windows may be
MKS, Interix, or MS-SFU.  I'm not sure if they include a compiler or not;
and if not, whether a compiler is available for those Windows environments.

And finally, another 'nother option is Microsoft's Visual C++ 2008 Express
Edition:
http://www.microsoft.com/express/default.aspx
http://www.microsoft.com/express/download/

Borland may have a free (or perhaps "free") C++ compiler as well.


I was surprised to find an ad for non-free software in GNU's gcc-help mailing list. I honestly feel offended by your shameless promotion of non-free software in this list.

Of course, in private, you are welcome to promote whatever you want but in this list I find it a lack of respect towards free software developers, specially those of us that are not being paid at all for working on GCC.

Sincerely,

	Manuel López-Ibáñez.

PS: How would Adobe or its employees react if on their own mailing lists I were promoting alternatives to Acrobat: http://www.cogniview.com/convert-pdf-to-excel/post/pdf-editing-creation-50-open-sourcefree-alternatives-to-adobe-acrobat/ or recommending blocking all flash content in the web: http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ I am sure Adobe wouldn't censor me but I could understand if they felt slightly offended, specially if I were in Adobe's mailing list asking for gratis help to the non-paid Adobe programmers to use for free their open-source products. Oh, wait a moment....



[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux