On 2007/11/29, Tom St Denis <tstdenis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > J.C. Pizarro wrote: > > There is some strange in the generated program. > > > > For large projects with uninitialized variables, the behaviour > > could be stochasticly flawed as a russian roulette. > > > > Can I just end this with "undefined behaviour is not defined?" > > If you want to know what is actually going on, fire up gdb, and > single-step asm operations. Most likely "3" is some counter in the > optimized case, (just happens to be) and not in the others. Who cares, > it's undefined. > > And stop using "stochastically random" too ... that's annoying. It's > called "garbage" (not to be confused with MSFT software ...). Q: What does it print? A: Random data. Q: How does it print? A: Stochastically. I said "it prints stochasticly random data". Is it wrong? > > :-) > > Tom > J.C.Pizarro
