Re: Some strict aliasing related fun

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Raymond Sheh wrote:

> > Specifying -fsome-optimization without an n >= 0 level of -On is a
> > no-op.  In other words, optimization must be enabled in order to do any
> > optimization.

I meant > 0 here, as -O0 means no optimization.

> This is all being tested on pretty much a standard Kubuntu 7.10 (Gutsy
> Gibbon) install using the distro's GCC packages ... perhaps is there
> some way of seeing what the defaults are set to? Is it possible that for
> some reason some optimisation level (below -O1, if there is such a
> thing) is enabled by default?

If you don't specify any -O the default is -O0, which is no
optimizations.

I don't know why you are able to also trigger a failure without
optimizations just by giving -fstrict-aliasing -fschedule-insns, but
it's kind of beside the point since combining source that violates the
aliasing rules with -fstrict-aliasing is just setting yourself up for
failure, regardless of the details.

Brian

[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux