Tom St Denis skrev: > The only way a function can know the length of an array pointed to by a > pointer is by the caller passing that information to the function. > > Probably the best way if you want to clear up the clutter is to use a > struct which has both a pointer and length (maybe stored as an int). > Length as an int?!? Sounds weird. What are negative values supposed to mean? It has to be an unsigned type, maybe size_t.
