Re: How can I get -std=c99 without definine __STRICT_ANSI__?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Rick Mann <rmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: How can I get -std=c99 without definine __STRICT_ANSI__?
From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 20 Sep 2007 13:20:25 -0700
Cc: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>, gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3ABDBFCC-5A49-4AF1-B24E-92A613B3E7FB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <C318322B.253E9%eljay@xxxxxxxxx> <3ABDBFCC-5A49-4AF1-B24E-92A613B3E7FB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.4

Rick Mann <rmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> If I do gnu99, am I still going to get __STRICT_ANSI__?

No.

Ian

References:
- Re: How can I get -std=c99 without definine __STRICT_ANSI__?
  - From: John Love-Jensen
- Re: How can I get -std=c99 without definine __STRICT_ANSI__?
  - From: Rick Mann

Prev by Date: Understanding Macro Pre-processor
Next by Date: local variable alignment on Solaris/SPARC, with gcc 4.x
Previous by thread: Re: How can I get -std=c99 without definine __STRICT_ANSI__?
Next by thread: Re: How can I get -std=c99 without definine __STRICT_ANSI__?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux