Re: __sync_lock_test_and_set on ARM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David Daney writes:
 > 
 > My personal preference would be to use the GCC builtins when
 > possible.  If they are not generating proper code for your target,
 > file a bug report so they can be fixed.

Mine too, but pre-ARM v6 the builtins can't be done in userland, so
what should gcc generate?  Syscalls?

Andrew.

[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux