RE: Help replacing ULL to eliminate pedantic error that ULL is C99

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 05:01 -0700, John (Eljay) Love-Jensen wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
> 
> > Is my use of a 64-bit constant valid?
> 
> If by "valid" you mean strictly ISO 14882 compliant:  no.
> 
> If by "valid" you mean a GCC extension to use "long long" to represent 64-bit integers:  yes.

What is a ISO 14882 compliant way of representing a 64-bit constant
value?

Stephen


[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux