Re: Linux c++ opmization--- linux runs at half the speed of windows?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Is your windows compiler doing automatic parallelization by chance?
Twice as fast on a dual core processor is a bit too coincidental.  :-)

On 3/8/07, Shane R <crazguy22@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,

I hope this is the appropriate forum. Please direct me to the correct one if
it is not.

I am trying to optimize a c++ application that I ported from a windows
system to Linux.
The app is a terminal based application that does some one time file io at
the start then runs completely in memory. After the one time io the app runs
successive timed epochs on the same data in Windows as Linux. The app is a
program that runs some code for doing non-linear optmization (math stuff).

The reason why I am posting is that I timed the time it takes for the
application to complete an epoch. It take twice as long in Linux as
windows?!?!

My system is an Intel Centrino Duo with 2gigs of ram. The application is
only using a fraction of available memory in windows and linux. The
application is single-threaded in both.

I am using Visual Studio 2003 in Windows and when I type gcc -v I get:
Target: i486-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure -v
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++,treelang --prefix=/usr
--enable-shared --with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib
--without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --enable-nls
--program-suffix=-4.1 --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-clocale=gnu
--enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-mpfr --enable-checking=release
i486-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.1.2 20060928 (prerelease) (Ubuntu 4.1.1-13ubuntu5)



I am currently using these g++ options:

CFLAGS = -o3 -O3 -march=pentium4 -ffast-math  -funroll-loops -Wall
-Wno-return-type

But I have tried every permutation of the above options to virtually no
effect

The average run time of an epoch in windows is about 3000 milliseconds while
the average run time of an epoch in Linux is 6000!

I don't know if it matters but I am doing calls to the rand() function in
both my windows and linux apps.

On another note does anyone have any experience with the Intel drop in
replacement for GCC?

Thanks in advance for any help,

Shane

_________________________________________________________________
Match.com - Click Here To Find Singles In Your Area Today!
http://match.engb.msn.com/




--
Lawrence Crowl

[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux