Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > I don't see any good solutions here. Except, perhaps, renaming your > header file. I already thought about that. But it just solves a symptom and not the underlying bug that -I. messes up the difference between <> and "" includes. But it guess I'll just rename it. I asked here because I thought I'm doing something very wrong, but it looks like everybody justs lives with the problem and doesn't care as long as it doesn't show up.. Thanks, Sebastian
