Pavel Saviankou writes: > > > > > We've been here before. What are you doing this? Why don't you write > > thet data into a file and read it at runtime? That's what everyone > > else would do. > > > > Reading the data at runtime would be no slower at all if you used > > mmap() to do it. > > It doesn't matter, why i do it on such way. Actually, it matters a lot. There are people here who know gcc well. They aren't being paid to reply here, they do so only for the satisfaction of helping people. When someone is told the right way to solve a problem, but they ignore the answer and carry on insisting that their way must be the right way, the knowledgeable people become demotivated and decide to do something more interesting instead. > The quastion is, why g++ cannot compile (without optimisaion, -O0, > -Q) function (even rathner large one), where is only assignation > code? what can be simpler than that? I'm not sure. I could debug gcc and find out where all the memory is going, but I have no reason to do so because you won't tell me a good reason why you need to do it. Andrew.
