Greg Smith <gsmith@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > [ 7] movl %edx, 24(%esp) > [ 8] movl %eax, 28(%esp) > #APP > bswap %eax > #NO_APP This makes it look like the bswap asm clobbered %edx. Can you post a small complete standalone preprocessed test case? It's quite difficult to analyze an incomplete one. Thanks. > Lines 41..45 all deal with trying to figure out if the low-order 2 bits > of effective_addr2 are zero. All I can say is, WTF? I can get around > this one by casting effective_addr2 to U32 and then testl/jne is > emitted, but I shouldn't have to do this?? This is most likely fixed by the lower-subreg patch I have been working on. Latest version here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-12/msg01858.html Ian
