Anitha Boyapati writes:
>
> On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Andrew Haley wrote:
>
> > Anitha Boyapati writes:
> > >
> > > Please let me know if I am missing something.It is important for
> > > me to get through this immediately :-(
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Sample Code :
> > >
> > > class X : class baseX {
> > > ...
> > > };
> > >
> > > class Y : class baseY {
> > > ...
> > > };
> > > //End of Code
> > >
> > > g++ -c -shared -o mem.so X.o Y.o
> > >
> > > ( This created mem.so )
> > >
> > > When used with dlopen as :
> > >
> > > handle = dlopen ("mem.so", RTLD_LAZY)
> > >
> > > The above statement throws error saying undefined reference to baseX
> > > and BaseY!
> >
> > No kidding. Where are baseX and BaseY defined?
>
> They are also included while building mem.so.But I got the mistake.
> I didnt define the virtual methods declared in X and Y out of pure
> ignorance :-)
>
> Doesnt it sound right if we have some error or warning thrown for such
> cases where definitions are not found while building a shared library?
Why? They might be defined in some other library.
Andrew.
