At 07:57 05.12.2006 -0600, John Love-Jensen wrote: >Hi Fabian, > >>Even if this is considered not good programming style, why is it so serious to >be an error and not just a warning? > >Because it isn't C++. Well, I didn't know that. I thought it may be "not that good" but still valid. But we'll stay with C++ :) Do you know a link where this is explained? There are many C++ references out there, but I can't find this case. Thanks bye Fabi
