Fabian Cenedese writes: > At 16:33 01.12.2006 -0500, John Yates wrote: > > I used exactly the same command line, I just switched path to binaries. > As the used 'as' is both the same it must be a change (regression?) > in gcc from 4.0 to 4.1. Or something new that as doesn't cope with yet. I don't think it's a regression exactly, it's just that we switched to emitting functions in dependency order. Andrew.
