Hi, Here is the sample program I have written : ------------------------------------------------------------ #include "user_defined.h" //using namespace user_defined; int main() { user_defined::base *b=new user_defined::base(); b->display(); user_defined::base *y = new user_defined::base(); y->display(); } --------------------------------------------------------- file : user_defined.h #include "mine.h" #include "yours.h" namespace user_defined { using namespace mine; //use all from mine using namespace yours; //use all from yours using yours::base; //resolve conflict for base in favour of yours }; ------------------------------------------------------------- Both mine::base and yours::base exists.(base is again another class) and as commented yours::base is favoured when there is a conflict. The problem I encountered is, I cannot directly use any decalaration related to base without scope resolution(user_defined::base). What I want is : Can I not make it work with using namespace user_defined; alone(the part has been commented ).If comments are removed and scope resolution is also removed, the compiler complaines of ambigous base class type. Can somebody pull me out? [I am trying this example with gcc version 3.2.3 20030502.The example is related to c++ Programming language by Stroustrup] Thanks in advance. -- Regards, Anitha B.