Re: Why don't gcc implement large model for x86-64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: hendric.lee@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Why don't gcc implement large model for x86-64
From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 10 Oct 2006 12:03:17 -0700
Cc: "gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx" <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <200610110212060659525@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <200610110212060659525@xxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.4

"hendric" <hendric.lee@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> As far as I know,current x86-64 gcc forces programmes linked in
> lower 2GB even though specified -mcmode=medium mode. But don't you
> think large mode too important? I wondered why large mode's out of
> implementation.

Because nobody has implemented it.

Volunteers are welcome.

Ian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why don't gcc implement large model for x86-64
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

References:
- Why don't gcc implement large model for x86-64
  - From: hendric

Prev by Date: Why don't gcc implement large model for x86-64
Next by Date: Re: gdb support for unnamed union/structure fields
Previous by thread: Why don't gcc implement large model for x86-64
Next by thread: Re: Why don't gcc implement large model for x86-64
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux