Tim Prince wrote: > The first suspect, when you don't confirm that you have followed > instructions at gcc.gnu.org, is ... > like maybe you didn't run configure. How could he build it if he hadn't run configure? You can see from the output that he's building in a different directory from the source which means he probably did read the instructions - or too recent a version. Korneez, from the output it looks like you ran 'make' not 'make bootstrap'; the build process has changed since 3.0 and the documentation on gcc.gnu.org is for the latest release. If you run 'make bootstrap' instead then it should only attempt to build the files that it failed on with a GCC 3.0 that it'd just built, which should succeed. However, if you just need a pre-4.0 compiler then you can install Fedora 4's compat-gcc-32 package to get gcc 3.2 already built for you. Rup. ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
