Re: -Wl vs -W1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andrew <andrew@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Wed, 5 Sep 2006, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> 
> > Are you sure you are asking about gcc?  To my knowledge gcc does not
> > support with a -Wl or a -W1 option.  This is what I see when I try it:
> 
> I think you must provide a comma (so the full option is probably
> technically -1, and -l,. The man page lists "-Wl,option". It passes
> arguments through to the linker by some means (I'm using it with
> -W1,-soname,libfoo.so.1).

Oh yeah, I managed to forget about that.  -Wl is used to pass options
to the linker.

-W1 still doesn't mean anything, though, as far as I know.

Ian

[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux