Re: Gcc extension: have a semicolon after a function definition ??

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: mwgong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Michael Gong)
Subject: Re: Gcc extension: have a semicolon after a function definition ??
From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:34:15 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx, gcc@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <01a801c6bb23$861461d0$2245a8c0@mwgong>
Sender: gcc-help-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx

> 
> Hi,
> 
> I am wondering why following program is compiled successfully by gcc ? 
> Please notice there is a ";" after the function definition.
> 
> Is there a gcc extension for it ?

Yes, use -pedantic-errors for showing if it is a GCC extension or not.

-- Pinski

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Gcc extension: have a semicolon after a function definition ??
  - From: Michael Gong

References:
- Gcc extension: have a semicolon after a function definition ??
  - From: Michael Gong

Prev by Date: Gcc extension: have a semicolon after a function definition ??
Next by Date: Re: Gcc extension: have a semicolon after a function definition ??
Previous by thread: Gcc extension: have a semicolon after a function definition ??
Next by thread: Re: Gcc extension: have a semicolon after a function definition ??
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux