RE: why my overloaded operate new is called?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Fan Xiaohua-A18426" <a18426@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "MSX to GCC" <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: why my overloaded operate new is called?
From: "John \(Eljay\) Love-Jensen" <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 19:17:19 -0700
References: <58DFCF788566D34C9436C8A61DEFAD397A49FA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: gcc-help-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx

Hi Fan,

I believe your placement new is not called because you did not include your header file, so main uses the inline version.

But that's just a guess.

HTH,
--Eljay

References:
- RE: why my overloaded operate new is called?
  - From: Fan Xiaohua-A18426

Prev by Date: RE: why my overloaded operate new is called?
Next by Date: Re: Question about RTL for bitwise AND
Previous by thread: RE: why my overloaded operate new is called?
Next by thread: Static linking C++
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux