John, you're the man !! It was the sequence of course. As mentioned, I had tried to shuffle the order of the libraries around... but for whatever reason (spuidness ?) it didn´t occur to me that I have to mention the .o before the libraries, since it relies to the functions in the librarues..... ARRGH. Maybe I should look into gardening or something :) Anyway, thanks so much for the help ! (Of course also to you, Leopold.) regards, Dieter John Love-Jensen wrote: > Hi Dieter, > > The command line is order sensitive. > > You have the order backwards. > > Put your .o files before the -l<lib> files. Otherwise, the linker says* > "Here I have libmyclass.lib, what missing symbols do I need out of there? > Hey, I don't have any missing symbols at the moment, I don't need to > incorporate anything from libmyclass.lib." > > Also, you don't need the -I<dir> for doing the linking operation. Doesn't > hurt, either. Just clutter. > > HTH, > --Eljay > > * Don't anthropomorphize linkers. They hate it when you do that.
