Re: WELCOME to gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Jan 27, 2006, "Vincent Barat" <vbarat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I'm working on a project for which a MN103 compiler is needed. We
> currently use Matsushita's standard compiler, which in turn is gcc 3.2.2
> patched and corrected by RedHat. This one works well, but the
> corrections seem to have never been released to the open source
> community.
 
I very much doubt it, but if you have any suggestion as to which fixes
failed to make it, please let me know and I'll be happy to have a
look.  It's more likely that, if you're playing with newer toolchains
targeted at mn10300-elf or am33_2.0-linux-gnu and they don't quite
work, they're just suffering from bit rot.  I know I've neglected
their maintenance for quite a while, but I'm afraid I didn't have much
of a choice.

> Also, I think RedHat should have contributed back to the open source
> community by giving their corrections and patches to the FSF. Am I right
> ?
 
Yes, and we did that, to the best of my knowledge.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva         http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer   aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist  oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}

[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux