Dixit Ryan Mansfield (2005-11-15 20:05): > There could be a function with a control flow that returns something useful > in one path and something meaningless in another. Or a function calls > another function that never returns (exit example). It is more important > for a compiler to follow the language standard and accept valid source than > it is to have a compiler that tries to enforce good programming practises > and design. I see. Can you cite some document that confirms that this indeed complies with the standard? I'm trying to read more about this. -- Pierre Sarrazin <sarrazip at sympatico dot ca>
