Re: Remainder ( % ) operator and GCC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Frans Englich <frans.englich@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Remainder ( % ) operator and GCC
From: Ian Lance Taylor <ian@xxxxxxxx>
Date: 09 Nov 2005 12:05:40 -0800
Cc: gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx, lmecir@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200511091944.49730.frans.englich@xxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx, lmecir@xxxxxxxxxxx, frans.englich@xxxxxxxxx
References: <4371F73D.30201@xxxxxxxxxxx> <m3y83xmxxj.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200511091944.49730.frans.englich@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: gcc-help-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.4

Frans Englich <frans.englich@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> > Don't use '%'.  It is machine dependent when used with a negative
> > number.
> 
> What should one use instead? What is the portable, machine-independent 
> alternative?

The div function.

Ian

References:
- Remainder ( % ) operator and GCC
  - From: Ladislav Mecir
- Re: Remainder ( % ) operator and GCC
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Remainder ( % ) operator and GCC
  - From: Frans Englich

Prev by Date: Re: Remainder ( % ) operator and GCC
Next by Date: Re: Updating powerpc-crosscompile environment from gcc-2.95.3
Previous by thread: Re: Remainder ( % ) operator and GCC
Next by thread: Re: Remainder ( % ) operator and GCC
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux