Re: 387 numerical instability

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Neil Ferguson <nferguso@xxxxxxx> writes:

> Whilst reading the GCC man page documentation for the -mfpmath option,
> I came across this sentence for -mfpmath=sse:
> 
> > The resulting code should be considerably faster in the major-
> > ity of cases and avoid the numerical instability problems of
> > 387 code, but may break some existing code that expects tempo-
> > raries to be 80bit.
> 
> Can someone point me to a description of these "numerical instability
> problems of 387 code", please?
> 
> I've searched the GCC site & mailing lists, and I've searched with
> Google, but I can't find anything that details the particular concerns
> that led to this note in the manual. All I can find is a list message
> containing the patch that put it into the man page.

See, e.g.,
    http://gcc.gnu.org/PR323
and the many PRs which have been marked as a duplicate of that one.

Ian

[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux