Alex J. Dam wrote: >On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 01:26:12AM -0400, Ernest L. Williams Jr. wrote: > > >>Should we use "NULL" to represent a null pointer or "0" to represent a >>null pointer? >> >> > >AFAIK, according to C++, they are equivalent. See, for example, > >http://www.research.att.com/~bs/bs_faq2.html#null > > This is true, they are equivalent. I would still advise using NULL myself, as then g++ will produce some (I feel) helpful warnings, for example 'NULL==1' or 'NULL + 1' will both produce "warning: NULL used in arithmetic". Chris
