On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 10:54:56AM -0400, Robert Dewar wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > >I'm not 100% sure what #3 means for enumerators whose value does not > >fit in the range of "int", but it's pretty clear that the > >implementation is not allowed to change the type of enumerators. > > Of course an implementation can do whatever it likes in response > to switches, compiler dependent declarations etc. Yes, but -fshort-enums is not intended to interfere with C99 compliance. And nowadays it doesn't. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC
