does GCC support assume, noop and _ReturnAddress?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: does GCC support __assume, __noop and _ReturnAddress?
From: Jonathan Wilson <jonwil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 23:26:53 +0800
Sender: gcc-help-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217

I know that these are microsoft inventions but does GCC support anythingsimilar?

Is there any reason why you couldnt add support for these keywords (orsomething similar to them) in GCC?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: does GCC support __assume, __noop and _ReturnAddress?
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: does GCC support __assume, __noop and _ReturnAddress?
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

Prev by Date: Re: Cross Compiler Unix - Windows
Next by Date: Re: does GCC support __assume, __noop and _ReturnAddress?
Previous by thread: How to install man pages for gcc 3.4.2?
Next by thread: Re: does GCC support __assume, __noop and _ReturnAddress?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux