On 8/2/05, Diego Novillo <dnovillo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 10:12:37PM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> > Harald van D??k <truedfx@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >
> > > I finally managed to track down the problem I've been having to this
> > > short code:
> > >
> > > typedef struct {
> > > unsigned car;
> > > unsigned cdr;
> > > } cons;
> > >
> > > void nconc (unsigned x, unsigned y) {
> > > unsigned *ptr = &x;
> > > while(!(*ptr & 3))
> > > ptr = &((cons *)(*ptr))->cdr;
> > > *ptr = y;
> > > }
> > >
> > > With gcc 4.0-20050728 on i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiling this with -O2
> > > appears to remove the assignment to *ptr. (I didn't prepare an example
> > > program, but it's verifiable with objdump.) Obviously, this code is
> > > non-portable, but still, I don't see why this can happen. Would anyone
> > > be kind enough to explain this to me? It works as expected with -O2
> > > -fno-strict-aliasing.
> >
> > Well, I'd say it's a bug. It works in 4.1. The final assignment gets
> > removed by tree-ssa-dce.c because it looks like a useless store. This
> > is because alias analysis thinks it knows what is going on, when it
> > clearly does not.
> >
> Are you sure? I am not a language lawyer, but my understanding
> is that you cannot legally make pointer 'p' point outside of
> 'x' using pointer arithmetic. Since 'x' is a PARM_DECL passed by
> value, the last assignment is a dead store.
p is not made to point 'outside' of x, but x is treated as a pointer, cast
to a struct pointer and then dereferenced. Only if the loop entry condition
is false we end up storing into x (but only to x, not to memory beyond x),
and this store is of course dead.
Richard.
