> someone created a rebuttal to that and corrected some errors > of fact and > omission. I'm sure if you were at the meeting you'd remember :) > I'm not sure if that is a bitchy retort to what might have been construed as a bitchy reply, perhaps you thought I was being patronising pointing out that PDF, perhaps its all in my head and these words really are just a string of bytes with no emotion or feeling attached, damn you email and your lack of soul :) Anyway, no offense intended, and no confusion intended if I didn't cause offense. Cheers for the info about the rebuttal, I'll be sure google for it. Gaz
