On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 09:37 +0100, Nathan Sidwell wrote: > [did you bcc to gnu.org and cc to gno.org? why?] I mistyped the edress, and then redelivered. I guess my mailer left the bad edress intact. Sorry. > > Ross Boylan wrote: > > > The type AbstractLinearProduct is defined in the header for > > LinearProduct, which is included in the .cc file. Googling, it sounds > > as if complaints about typeinfo may signal missing RTTI. However, I did > > not compile with no-rtti, and the included files referenced are all > > source files. > > Are you sure you have a definition of each non-pure virtual function. In > particular check the first non-inline non-pure virtual function of > AbstractLinearProduct. The compiler uses that (if it exists) as a key. > It will emit the vtable, typeinfo and other class related objects in the > object file containing that key. > > nathan > Wow! That was the problem exactly. I omitted the =0 from one function definition. Now it all works. I don't know how long that would have taken me to find on my own. Thank you very much.
