Re: second parameter of `va_start' not last named argument

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Exactly, you know the number and so you provide the value to va_start.
 The user calling foo does not provide this.

corey


On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 02:19:06 +0100, Antonio Coralles
<noche.suapie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> is there a way to prevent this gcc warning?
> in a code similar to
> 
> void foo(const std::string& format, ...);
> 
> i determine the neccessary number of arguments by counting the
> occurences of "%s" in format,
> similar to printf. therefore, there is no need for the caller to pass
> the number of arguments as a second
> argument.
> 
> thanks
>              Antonio
>

[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux