Re: Possible gcc 3.4.4 bug.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 09 March 2005 21:45, Phillip Neiswanger wrote:

> template <class T> class Base
> {
>    public:
>      int size() { return m_sz; }
>    protected:
>      int m_sz;
> };
> template<class T> class Derived : public Base<T>
> {
>    public:
>      int size() { return m_sz; }
> };
>
> The errors are as follows:
>
> pgn> g++34 t.cc
> t.cc: In member function `int Derived<T>::size()':
> t.cc:11: error: `m_sz' undeclared (first use this function)
> t.cc:11: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each
> function it appears in.)

No bug here: gcc 3.4.+ implements the standard c++ two phase name lookup.
This error happens while the compiler parses Derived<T> -- at that moment 
("Phase 1"), he has no idea what Base<T> contains, because this knowledge is 
only available during instantiation of Derived<T> (Phase "2"). In "Phase 1" 
the compiler looks at m_sz and sees, that it does not depend on any template 
parameter, so the compiler decides that m_sz must have a meaning independent 
from any binding of the template parameters (Suppose you would specialize 
Base<int> to have no m_sz member to see what that means). If you prefix m_sz 
with Base<T>:: or Derived<T>:: however, you turn m_sz into a depended name 
for which semantic lookup is postponed onto "Phase 2".

-- 
Marco

[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux