On 2005-02-09 11:28:03 -0500, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > Try the -ffloat-store option. Of course, this is what I do when I notice a problem (but I often forget it). > It's not the default because it's slows down the generated code too > much, and most people don't care. But you raise an interesting point > about the ISO C standard. It is possible that in strict C99 mode gcc > should enable -ffloat-store on the x86. and gcc shouldn't claim C conformance (via __STDC__ and __STDC_VERSION__) when -ffloat-store is not enabled on x86. -- Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA
